According to the passage, why did Texas pay for its capitol with land?
Basic Understanding of a Variety of Texts · TELPAS Grades 10–12 reading. The correct answer, and the reasoning behind it.
Reporting category 2: find the main idea and key details, and follow what happens in stories and informational texts.
Read the passage. Then answer the questions.
A Capitol Paid For With Land
Visitors to Austin often notice that the Texas Capitol looks a lot like the United States Capitol in Washington, D.C., with its tall dome and long wings. Fewer notice that the Texas building is actually a little taller. And very few know how Texas paid for it: not with money, but with land.
In 1881, a fire destroyed the old capitol building. Texas needed a new one, but the state had little money to spend. What it did have was land. Even before the fire, lawmakers had set aside about three million acres in the Texas Panhandle to pay for a new capitol, and the state offered that land to whoever would build it.
A group of investors from Chicago agreed to the deal. In exchange for building the capitol, they received the land. They turned it into a cattle operation called the XIT Ranch, which covered a huge stretch of the western Panhandle and became one of the largest fenced ranches in the world.
The builders first planned to use limestone from Central Texas. But when the stone was tested, it was found to stain and change color when exposed to the weather. The owners of Granite Mountain, near Marble Falls, offered to donate red granite instead. Granite is harder to cut than limestone, which made the work slower, but it would last far longer. That pinkish-red stone became the building's best-known feature.
The new capitol was finished in 1888. Today it still holds the office of the governor and the chambers where the Texas Legislature meets. Every time lawmakers gather under that dome, they are working inside a building that the state bought with three million acres of open land.
The question
Choose the best answer.
According to the passage, why did Texas pay for its capitol with land?
- The investors from Chicago only wanted to become ranchers.
- The state had little money but owned a lot of land.Correct answer
- Land in the Panhandle was worth more than the new building.
- The fire of 1881 had destroyed all of the state's money.
Why “The state had little money but owned a lot of land.” is correct
This is a detail question about cause. Paragraph 2 says the state "had little money to spend. What it did have was land." The short sentence "What it did have was land" signals the contrast that explains the decision.
Why the other answers are wrong
- The investors from Chicago only wanted to become ranchers. — They did start a ranch, but the passage gives the state's lack of money as the reason.
- Land in the Panhandle was worth more than the new building. — The passage never compares the value of the land with the value of the building.
- The fire of 1881 had destroyed all of the state's money. — The fire destroyed the old capitol building, not the state's money.
Practice more of this
More reading practice for Grades 10–12, or see the TELPAS practice test for 10th–12th grade.
This is an independent study resource. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or connected to the Texas Education Agency or the official TELPAS program. All questions here are original practice material written to match the published test design.